Search: Site   Web
The Ball Gunner ~ Snarky commentary on global military affairs

Archive for the 'not-so-hot ideas' Category

So its the end

February 6th, 2009, 9:45 am by jhogg

The Ball Gunner you all know and love is going away.

In it’s place is the newester, betterester, more user friendlister blog on the pluck forums at the News Herald.

For everyone who has enjoyed visiting ballgunner.freedomblogging.com you can check out the new site at:

http://www.newsherald.com/share/profiles/?slid=15d95909-ec17-3ba4-b539-096a9c3c3378&plckController=PersonaBlog&plckScript=personaScript&plckElementId=personaDest&plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a15d95909-ec17-3ba4-b539-096a9c3c3378Post%3a62ed0e6a-ed2f-44ee-8135-7323760a2b6e&sid=sitelife.newsherald.com#none

No, that’s not a joke.

If you want updates on a new gunner I’ve heard about AND YOU PROBABLY WANT THIS UPDATE. You should shoot me an email at jhogg— AT—pcnh.com and please not the spam protected spelling.

B-17 Ball Gunner - final transmission

http://www.b17sam.com/files/crash.jpg

A LA Times reporter embeds with the Taliban, good info coming

January 12th, 2009, 12:13 pm by jhogg

These sorts of things inevitably devolve into furious barkings about the media siding with the enemy and yellow journalism, grrrr woof woof. I would point out that flying in and out of Afghanistan is simpler than most realize, and any of the pansies at Hyper-Nationalism Weekly easily could pony up to do a tour as an embedded reporter.

But there are all sorts of juicy tidbits in there — a calm confidence among the Taliban that victory is inevitable (which differs from the pansies at HNW who merely maintain that defeat is unthinkable), the well-supplied and luxurious life of the fighters, and is that a U.S. Army issue MOLLE pouch in the main photo?

Give it a read

———————————————————————-

For some good news, Army Future Combat Systems is getting thinner and thinner, and we can only hope it soon will go away entirely.

The Future Combat Systems (FCS) is designed to make the Army lighter and more agile through an intricate web of manned and unmanned ground and aerial vehicles all linked together by a digital network.

This program has existed for so long and promised so much that is now hovers as some potential Olympian god with a penchant for smiting the unbelieving. But what remains a mystery is how a highly complex electronic network requiring extra gear, training and logistics will create a “lighter and more agile” Army.

If the Army wanted to become “lighter and more agile” I would advise them to jam a few people in with the Taliban (see above) and relearn light infantry tactics. Of course, the “lighter and more agile” Army is the secondary mission of the objective, the first being to make Boeing and Science Applications International Corp rich. Cashing in at $160 billion (not yet finished) it would seem it has been a thundering success in at least one arena.

Iraq, NASA and the old Whubba-whubba returns

January 5th, 2009, 4:18 pm by jhogg

I’m normally pretty lean on bat packs to the hulking giants of the media field. But the Washington Post has an unusually well-done piece on Iraq.

Friday, January 2, 2009; Page A01
Washington Post Foreign Service
BAGHDAD — Maybe it was the only shot heard for days in a neighborhood once ordered by the cadence of gunfire. Perhaps it was the smiles at checkpoints and the shouts of Iraqi policemen navigating the always snarled traffic. “God’s mercy on your parents,” they beseeched. “God’s blessings on you.” Maybe it was the music box still playing “Santa Claus Is Coming to Town” at a kiosk overflowing with Christmas tree decorations and heart-shaped red pillows.
For anyone returning to Baghdad after spending time here during its darkest days two years ago, when it was paralyzed by sectarian hatred and overrun by gunmen sowing despair, the conclusion seemed inescapable.
“The war has ended,” said Heidar al-Abboudi, a street merchant.
The war in Iraq is indeed over, at least the conflict as it was understood during its first five years: insurgency, communal cleansing, gangland turf battles and an anarchic, often futile quest to survive. In other words, civil war — though civil war was always too tidy a term for it. The entropy, for now at least, has run its course. So have many of the forces the United States so dangerously unleashed with its 2003 invasion, turning Iraq into an atomized, fractured land seized by a paroxysm of brutality. In that Iraq, the Americans were the final arbiter and, as a result, deprived anything they left behind of legitimacy.
________________________________________________________
Let me be (probably not) the first to say I’m am adamantly opposed to this:

Obama considers linking Defense Dept. with NASA

President-elect Barack Obama appears to be gearing up for a space race 2.0, this time with China.

Obama’s transition team is considering doing away with some of the barriers that separate the U.S. Department of Defense and NASA, according to Bloomberg.

Citing people who’ve discussed the idea with the Obama team, Bloomberg says they believe collaboration between the country’s civilian space agency and the military’s space program would speed up the time in which the U.S. is able to send people back to the moon.

The main–and very costly–goal is to build a rocket that can carry Orion, NASA’s next-generation spacecraft, to the International Space Station, the moon, and further out into the solar system. NASA has planned to use its new Ares I rocket for that purpose. Last year, it completed preliminary design review for the Ares rocket, which is slated to launch for the first time in 2015.

Which race, specifically, are we worried about losing with China? As I recall, the United States has a 40-year lead in the race to the moon. Do we think the Chinese will yank our flag from the soil and plunk their own down in its place?

As for combining NASA and DoD, I cannot think of any better example of what is commonly referred to as the “creeping militarization” of the nation. Are we a nation with a military or a military with a nation?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Whubba Whubba!

Now if we can get those old Huey’s flying again then I say its time we refit the Phantoms and get the U.S. a proper interceptor.

ad_icon

Utter insanity

December 5th, 2008, 11:28 am by jhogg

The Washington Times clearly has gone hurdling, arms and legs flailing, over the waiting mouths of hungry sharks below. Today’s editorial must be written by mediums channeling some bizarre, other-worldly spirits peaking into a universe that is not our own.

A nuclear-capable Iran armed with ICBMs could be only months away. Meanwhile Washington drifts, awaiting more compelling news to shake it from its lethargy.

Which is to say that invasion by men from mars “could be only months away,” or that a total shift in the human psyche that will see 90 pound nerds and Ball Gunners heralded as the epitome of men “could be only months away.”graphics8.nytimes.com

The Iranian nuke program has become the ultimate Washington boogey man. Absent any evidence that Iran is working toward weaponized nukes, Washington has simply concoted their own. This is in addition to a missle program so hilarious that it became the butt of photoshop hilarity on Fark. Note a stellar success rate of the 75 percent in the released photo.

Now those Shahab-3s are rumored to be able to hit Israel, maybe, Allah willing, on a sunny spring day with no wind and all the planets in the solar system lined up. Being that Iran’s missile development now has pulled a few hairs ahead of the Third Reich’s 60 year-old V-2 rockets, the Times immediately jumps to the conclusion that Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles are just “months” away. I’m sure the Times thinks that building a longer range missile is just a matter of strapping a bigger booster, maybe a series of boosters, or just some Wile E. Coyote type contraption with a catapult, a series of booster and an anvil.

blog.wired.com

I occasionally cringe when I wade into the past and read some of the editorials I wrote in college. But I’d have a hard time coming up with anything this bad. We really should expect more from our media than blatent scare mongering. There are some real things we should devote attention to in this world. It really doesn’t look like Iran’s nuclear program is one of them. But I’ll lend more credence to adults who believe in Santa Claus than adults who believe an Iranian ICBM is going to crest the horizon any moment now.

img329.imageshack.us

A quick news run down and a happy Turkey Day

November 26th, 2008, 8:33 am by jhogg

It appears that Robert Gates will continue on as Secretary of Defense. For our locay fly boys (and girls) this has one major implication (which will be revealed after the fold - HA!)

From the LA Times:

By Julian E. Barnes, Paul Richter and Christi Parsons
November 26, 2008
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has agreed to serve in President-elect Barack Obama’s Cabinet, advisors said Tuesday, setting up the unusual situation in which a wartime Pentagon chief remains to work under a president who has condemned the previous administration’s policies.

An official close to the Obama transition team said it was likely that Gates would be named Defense secretary when the president-elect begins to unveil his national security team in announcements expected next week.


A former government official who has advised the Obama transition said it was “99% certain” that Gates would remain as Defense secretary for about a year in the Obama administration.

“Nothing is definitive,” said the former official, who like others spoke on condition of anonymity when discussing transition plans. “But Gates did agree to stay on.”

Gates continuation is the likely final nail in the F-22 Raptor’s procurement coffin. Gates, who famously said, “We’re fighting two wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the F-22 has not performed a single mission in either theater,” is not going to give the Air Force the funding it wants for the program, nor is he likely to bow down to a Congress hoping to score political points by requiring their purchase. The chances for a procurement boom, already slim under a democratic presidency, are all but evaporated.

Part 2:

The Ball Gunner is pleased to hear that Al Qaeda has abandoned an area it never had:

From the Wall Street Journal:

WASHINGTON — Pakistan has replaced Iraq as al Qaeda’s main focus, and the terror group has stepped up its efforts to destabilize the nuclear-armed South Asian nation, according to a senior U.S. military commander.

“Iraq is now a rear-guard action on the part of al Qaeda,” said Gen. James Conway, the head of the Marine Corps and a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in an interview. “They’ve changed their strategic focus not to Afghanistan but to Pakistan, because Pakistan is the closest place where you have the nexus of terrorism and nuclear weapons.”

Gen. Conway also offered a stark assessment of the Afghan situation, saying the Taliban has built a rudimentary command-and-control network that enables the group’s leadership to direct attacks across the country.

“They move troops around. They resupply. They provide money,” he said. “It’s effective and it’s real. It’s not just happenstance that these guys know where to go and what to do.”

It’s an uphill battle to beat these fires out. But as has been noted time and again, Al Qaeda in Iraq is hardly the enemy we so desperately want it to be.

The monger sect likes to claim these arguments are mere semantics, which demonstrates only that they wield a keen judo grip on ignorance. Iraq’s long history of secular government has made the majority of Iraqis particularly poorly suited for the Salafist Islam espoused by the Osama Bin Ladin (may demons eat his flesh) and the structure of Al Qaeda (may demons eat their flesh, too). We need to get this through our head; if we can’t identify who we are fighting we surely won’t be able to beat them.

Finally:

Happy Thanksgiving!

Bill Lind lets fly with an homophobic stinker

November 13th, 2008, 10:32 am by jhogg

I really like William Lind, and I like his “I am your grandfather’s Republican” sort of conservativism. But occasionally I think he puts his ideological cart so far in front of his reality horse that he wind up riding way around the bend.

His latest mad dash (Hyah! Mule!) “Obama First Test” is half partly right and half completely wrong.

President Obama’s first test in the national security arena is likely to come not from al Qaeda or Iran or the Taliban but from within his own Democratic Party. Powerful constituencies in that party, the Feminists and the gays, will demand that he open the ground combat arms to women and allow acknowledged homosexuals to serve in the U.S. armed forces. If he agrees to either of these demands, or both, he will begin his Presidency by doing immense damage to the fighting ability of the America military.

First and foremost, I simply can’t fathom anyone forcing the Army and Marines to open the “ground-pounding grunt” fields to women. There are good reasons to keep women out of infantry, engineers artillary and a few other professions. Simply put, any standard fitness routine will crank out stronger men than women. There are plenty of arguments to be made about agility, flexibility, dexterity, whatever, but when it comes to hauling a M-240B, with tripod and ammo, in addition to food clothing and whatever else a woman is never going to have the raw strength of a man. Ditto pounding pickets, loading Paladin rounds, doing a fireman’s carry, etc. The best metaphor I’ve ever heard is that when two guys are goofing around and wrestling their primary concern is winning (within bounds), when a guy is wrestling with his girlfriend his primary concern is not hurting her.

But Lind really heads out on a shaky limb when he speaks of “the gays” as unfit for duty for any of the same reasons as women.

Barring indisputable sissies, of which there are a fair few gay, straight and other, there is no reasonable explanation for why a gay man should not be allowed to volunteer to defend his nation. He tries to conjur up the usual imagery of two dudes doing it in the shower or of young Pvt. Billy getting raped in his foxhole by the evil predatory gay man and ends up conjuring nothing more than a ridiculous idea that no one with any sense would accept.

First, militaries must represent the society they spring from. There were grim forecast of death and destruction when the services were integrated, and there were unpleasantries. The result was a better, stronger, military. The modern U.S. military must represent the U.S., and our nation increasingly is ambivalent about homosexuality. This is, despite protestations to the contrary, a promotion of the Founder’s dream of creating a nation where “all men are created equal,” (which isn’t to say we haven’t fudged other parts of the Founder’s dream.)

Second, to assume a gay man’s future service would be lessened because of his sexuality is also to declare that all past service by homosexuals is lessened. You’d have to be stupid to assume that none of them men killed at Bunker Hill, Gettysburg, Verdun or the Ardennes Forest were gay. You’d have to be insane to think none of the names inscribed on the Vietnam Veteran’s Memorial are names of gay men. Should those names be chisled away?

And you’d have to be way adrift on moron sea to think none of the volunteers in our current military are gay.

Bottom line, there are gays serving in our military, openly. They are deploying with regularity. And the only ones that seem to care are the pogues in charge of the linguists program who are merrily booting Arab linguists (good thing we don’t need any of those right now.) Even when I was in, way back yonder from 99-03, there were guys that didn’t leave much question. They neither flaunted it nor hid it and behaved almost like you’d expect adults to behave. Other than a few oafs that remained perpetual privates, no one cared, and I never heard of anyone getting an unwilling rogering in the foxhole, either.

So, with all due respect to Mr. Lind, this column was a stinker. History is full of gay men serving in and even, ahem, leading militaries, and the nation most famous for turning out a true turd booting military culture was notorious for everyone shagging just about everyone else.

I’ll give a nod to Lind for being an idealist, there’s nothing wrong with that, and he’s a brilliant military thinker. But he also is an ivy league educated, Washington worker. He’d be about as comfortable slamming Bud Light with grimy Army Privates as he would be on a bed of nails. So when he writes things like,

One of the most basic human factors is that men fight to prove they are real men. They join fighting organizations, whether the U.S. Army or U.S. Marine Corps or MS-13, because those organizations are made up of fighting men. Their membership is a badge of honor that says, “We’re not sissies or pansies. We are men who fight, serving alongside other men who fight.” That tells others and themselves they are real men.

If ideologically-driven policies deprive fighting organizations of their ability to convey that message, men who want to prove they are real men will not join. Instead of men who want to fight and will fight, they will end up recruiting men who join for good pay, or education benefits, or because they can’t get a civilian job. Armies like that may fight when they have no other choice, but if they come up against opponents who want to fight, they will be in trouble.

I feel like he needs to be sat down for a good talking to. Bill, history is full of people who join up for pay, for the benefits and because they’re too aggressive, too undisciplined and too uneducated to do anything else. I’ve served with them, starved, roasted, froze, marched, suffered and at the end of the day gotten plowed like a champ.

Try feeding a Marine lance corporal or a young airman with a 19-year old pregant wife all that ideological stuff and be prepared for some weird looks. People serve for all sorts of reasons, and if a man wants to raise that right right and spend 3,4 or 20 years pounding pickets or hauling mortars we shouldn’t be in the business of stopping them.

The Syria attack - the Ball Gunner’s take UPDATE - target confirmed

October 28th, 2008, 11:04 am by jhogg

The U.S. strategy of alienating anyone and everyone in the Middle East while trying to build a friendly country took a turn for the weird over the weekend when the military crossed over into Syria, ostensibly to chase down Al Qaeda or to send a warning (free registration required.) From what I’ve been able to put together, the attacks wacked eight people and there are rumors floating around that at least two people were uncerimoniously hauled off.

What we’re left with is sifting through the rubble and the propaganda to find out what exactly happened down there. U.S. public relations folks are doing their standard routing of maintaining everyone killed was, if not another Hitler, at least a Pol Pot. The Syrian’s story is that it was a construction site full of people simply going about their day. http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/maps/IraqProvincial_2005_lg.jpg

Of course, the multi-headed Hydra of U.S. operations has too many mouths to keep everything straight. Last Friday, Maj. Gen. (Marine) John Kelly, the guy responsible for Anbar province, told U.S. News and World Reports “that Syria has become ‘a sanctuary’ for [Al Qaeda in Iraq."] When asked whether the Syrian border presented a problem for operations in the area, his reponse was, “We don’t go across the border, for sure.”

For your viewing amusement, Anbar is that big ole’ yellow triangle looking thing on the west edge of the map. The big gray smudge along the western border is Syria. To the north of Anbar is the festive Ninawa province, home of Mosul, which is not doing so hot right now, either.

On a side note, and just a quick reminder on how bloody old civilizations in this part of the world are: there’s no “W” sound in Arabic, so whenever you see a “W” what you need to be saying is “V.” (EDIT: See below - there actually is a “W” sound in Arabic. Nevertheless, Ninawa IS the archeologically accepted location of ancient Ninevah - Ah well, Ball Gunner’s can’t be right all the time.) So when you see Ninawa, what you need to be saying is “Nin-eh-vah” as in Nineveh, as in the place in the Bible where Jonah was headed when he decided to skip out and allegedly spent some time in intestinal confinement. So bear it in mind that we’re dealing with places so old that they’re more easily remembered by ancient myth than modern association. And not some sissy “I cannot tell a lie” myth, either, but some good old timey Godly smiting and “you’re going to sit your behind in that fish and think about what you’ve done” sort of mythology.

But fast forward a millenia or seven and things still aren’t making a whole lot of sense. For starters, if the Syria is really serving as a launch pad for beturbaned mustache twiddlers then it’s apparently news to “U.S. Officials,” and surely “officials” must include at least a few military, who recently reported that a whopping 20 people per month were coming across the Syrian border. Now, I haven’t seen the immigration numbers recently, but I’m going out on a limb and saying if the Syria-Iraq border is SO porous that 20 people sneak across per month that we probably should be sending every U.S. Border Patrol agent to Syria for whatever sort of high-speed hardcore training they’re getting out there.

Second, it goes without saying that, absent the commies, Al Qaeda is the best boogeymen we’ve got around. They caught us napping back in 2001 and slugged us so hard that the country’s collective ears are still ringing. But just about everything I’ve read comes to the conclusion that AQI is mostly a rabble-rouser in Iraq, despite the “officials” protestations to the contrary.

Andrew Tilghman’s article in Washington Monthly titled The Myth of AQI was one of the first serious swipes at the notion of AQI running the show. The definitive work is the Congressional Research Service report Al Qaeda in Iraq: Assessment and Outside Links. The CRS states what I’ve long argued, that Iraqis aren’t particularly predisposed to the sort of nutjob Islam proposed by Al Qaeda. Saddam Hussein’s rule, for all its many flaws, was rather secular, meaning all the crazy Wahabbi Islam stuff across the border in Saudi Arabia never made an appearance (largely because fundamental Islam was a threat to the secular dictatorship.) And even before Hussein, Iraq’s rule under the British and the half dozen monarchs and military coups all had a secular flavor. Long story short, trying to introduce the bongo version of Islam that Osama Bin Ladin wants to shoehorn onto the world in Iraq would be like trying to introduce 16th century Puritanism into modern day San Francisco.

The same more or less holds true in Syria. In fact, if anyone has shown the world that it simply does not tolerate Islamic extremism it would be the Syrians. Back in 1982 when the Muslim Brotherhood got uppity and decided to seize the city of Hama, the Syrian government surrounded the city, shelled it into oblivion for three weeks, and by some accounts pumped tge few remaining buildings where the insurgents were hiding full of poison gas. The survivors found in the city were more or less assumed to be sympathizers and tortured or summarily executed. To this day the Hama Massacre is held as the gold standard of how to send a message. To this day, if you’re wondering around Syria and you pipe up with, “I love me some Allah” you’d better follow that with a quick, “But I love me some President-for-life al-Assad even more.” Besides, the ruling duo look more like flashy East Europeans than Islamist theocrats, and Mrs. al-Assad certainly is easy on the Ball Gunner’s eyes.

I’m not saying the Syrians are all sunshine and lollypops. The Syrians have been some of the best funders of Hezbollah for a variety of political reasons. But that’s crazy Islam in someone else’s country. Big difference.

What this brings us back to, is what in the world was the cross border raid all about. The notion that there was some AQI schmuck hiding out in Syria is certainly plausible. But that doesn’t explain the sort of urgency that justifies an international incident. Maj. Gen. Kelly said that Syria is where foreign Al Qaeda fighters are flowing in from, but even the blowhards from the Weekly Standard say that foreign fighters make up only about 10% of AQI. At this point I’m not entirely ready to discount the entire Pentagon having gone crazy or some loco attempt to pull of some Hollywood style snatch and grab.

For all we know at this point someone made the supreme strategic error of giving a Lieutenant the map and now we’re playing cover your backside. But one safe bet, the U.S. can’t possibly hope to pull together an agreement with Iraq if every neighbor on the block, Sunni, Shia and other, is leaning on Iraq to give the the U.S. the boot.

_______________________________________________________________________________

UPDATE:

Alright, Long War Journal is saying that Al Qaeda leader Abu Ghadiya was the target of the raid. The excitement isn’t catching.

US strike in Syria “decapitated” al Qaeda’s facilitation network

The identity of Ghadiya and several members of his senior staff have been known since February 2008 when the US Treasury identified Ghadiya, his brother, and his two cousins as members of the network. The US Treasury department publicly designated Ghadiya, his brother, Akram Turki Hishan Al Mazidih, and his two cousins, Ghazy Fezza Hishan Al Mazidih and Saddah Jaylut Al Marsumis as senior members of al Qaeda’s foreign facilitation network.

Ghadiya, whose real name is Badran Turki Hishan Al Mazidih, was an Iraqi from Mosul. He was working as an al Qaeda logistics coordinator in Syria since 2004, when he was appointed to the position by Abu Musab al Zarqawi. After Zarqawi’s death, he “took orders directly, or through a deputy” from Abu Ayyub al Masri, al Qaeda’s current leader in Iraq.

A logistics coordinator. So… we just killed a supply sergeant? Not to belittle the effort, the Long War Journal is a credible source and paints this guy as a high level logistics agent. But this seems like a poor target to alienate Syria for. If we push the Syrians to overt support for Al Qaeda then a high level logistics coordinator will be the least of our worries.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Syria has taken an unsurpising move and frozen diplomatic relations with the U.S. The extent of this has yet to be felt, but I’m willing to wager Ball Gunner bucks that Hezbollah leaders are already licking their chops and anticipating a financing increase.

CATO’s good sense falls on Washington’s deaf ears

October 23rd, 2008, 10:20 am by jhogg

CATO institute writers Benjamin H. Friedman and Justin Logan have issued a common sense plea to knock of all the NATO shenanigans about Ukraine and Georgia. The Ball Gunner has already tackled why severing Ukraine from Russia is about as likely as the dreaded Iranian invasion of the U.S. we’re told to worry about so much. Both the sitting dope, and the two dopes currently running, are all about extending the NATO road to Ukraine - and all those damned Ukrainians, 63 percent of which don’t want to join NATO, can just shut their traps.

As for Georgia, we’re clearly in lunatic territory now. Russia or no Russia, the Caucasus nations’ borders havehttp://www.globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/tbilisi_0001.jpg always been more or less a form of interpretive dance. As in, I’m going to dance over here with some guns and then the border goes this way. John McCain, George Bush and Barack Obama all support wrapping Georgia up in the NATO blanket. This despite the fact that Mikheil Saakashvili is a close contender for best tin-pot thug of 2007, after he called in the police to dispatch anti-government protests and shut down opposition TV station IMEDI. So even if you get past the point of allowing an unstable nation into NATO, you still have the rather prickly problem that:

  • Saakashvili started a war
  • Russia countered
  • If Georgia was a NATO nation then the U.S. and western Europe would have been REQUIRED to assist them

That’s kind of the point people seem to miss, once you’re a NATO nation the gist of the matter is that you don’t have to do this stuff alone any more. If Georgia had been a NATO member back in August then the U.S. would be fighting a third war, and a much worse war, and very likely a world war, this very moment. It’s true that the Russian military at this point isn’t all it pretends to be, but there are long lines of bones from Moscow to Paris and then Volgagrad (was Stalingrad) to Berlin. Being that neither George Bush, nor Barack Obama, nor John McCain would be doing the freezing amid General Winter and General Mud I suppose these things are of little consequence to them.

Opening up NATO to these two, not entirely stable, nations is asking for nothing but trouble. Of course, its total exposure as a poor idea undoubtedly means it will be pursued with gusto. Like William Lind, I occasionally wish we had only one monarch for several decades, there would be a greater chance of talking sense into them.

On a humerous note that will fly over the heads of most, Russia apparently thinks the U.S. really should stay in Iraq a bit longer.

From other fronts:

The looming disaster in the Pakistan-Afghanistan region rapidly is decending into a comedy of errors. The lack of a unified strategy means a hodge-podge of actions that only push forward in one area by pushing back in another. But the combined might of Generals Larry, Curly and Moe have decided that arming the tribal militias in Pakistan (free registration required) is the solution du jure. While this is billed as a Pakistani solution, the reality is that this is likely a U.S. solution handed to the Pakistanis.

First, if the problem in the area is a LACK OF ACCESS to weapons then I’ve apparently been reading the wrong news.
Second, the reason this resoundingly fails the smell test is the desperate attempt to brand this as “Surge: Part Deux - Surge Harder” or whatever. Even the military has proclaimed the obvious, that attempting a surge type strategy in Afghanistan would be well beyond worthless. Iraqis, despite their religious divide and total willingness to kill the ever loving crap out of each other, DO have a common identity as Iraqis, with a shared language, common ethnicity, common lineage and the like. Afghans, on the other hand, don’t really havy any of that stuff. What they’ve got instead is a mash of Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks and half dozen smaller groups each trying to chisel out a small corner of the mountains and valleys to kick back with their wives and enjoy all the benefits the 18th century has to offer. Handing out weapons to the Pashtun in Pakistan is essentially the same as handing out weapons to the Pashtun in Afghanistan, and when the Pashtun in Afghanistan are not fighting foreigners they are quite content to spend their time fighting the Uzbeks and Tajiks. Just maybe the Uzbeks and Tajiks will resent being shot at by weapons provided by the U.S. / Pakistan. At least, I would.

But we’ve still got nothing but noise coming from the sound box in Washington. (from the Wa-Po article)

“There is a significant, but not a comprehensive, bump up in the security element,” one official said. While there are more soldiers on the ground, he said, the military strategy is not sustainable because Pakistan “is still doing virtually nothing about extending the government’s political authority into the tribal areas, and virtually nothing about economic development” in the region.

Of course they are “doing virtually nothing about extending government’s political authority into the tribal areas” you bleeding wanker! There has never been “political authority” in the tribal areas outside the tribes - get it, Gus? NEVER-NEVER-NEVER-NEVER-NEVER!!!!!!

Meanwhile, As Hamid Karzai and the Afghan state slide ever closer to the chasm of illegitimacy and irrelevance, NATO has stumbled upon the perfect solution - just pick some other poor schmoe to lead Afghanistan. Of course, the Afghans have plans of their own when it comes to governance. After being ingloriously runoff by the Northern Alliance, the Taliban are resurfacing as the de facto government in many regions.

As William Lind has noted, cutting a deal with the Taliban that returns them to power with the promise of keeping out Al Qaeda might be the best hope for Afghanistan.

Here’s hoping that the new silverback in the Oval Office is paying attention.

The huge, mega, major, über event no one is talking about

October 1st, 2008, 9:54 am by jhogg

Anyone who pays attention knows that today the Sunni-backed Awakening Councils were handed over to the primarily Shia goverment of Iraq. The jist, of course, is that in the nation of snoozers no one is paying attention to anything.

The provided link is to an Agence France-Presse story. If you head to CNN, Fox News or MSNBC there isn’t the first lick about Iraq anywhere to be found. Presumably the stuff about reality TV shows and celebrity gossip trump major international policy, or at least they do here. If you go to the BBC Web site you at least can find something near the bottom.

This is all circumspect in modern age. “The surge worked” is the mantra and that’s that, why are we still talking about it? If you’ve got at least a functioning brain stem, which automatically excludes a good 90% of the nation, you can probably riddle out that saying “the surge worked” at this point is kind of like saying “the house is built” when the first shipment of lumber arrives. What happens in the next few days and weeks will be the first and only indication of whether we have cobbled together a workable system. If things sour then it will not only sound the last hurrah for U.S. policy in the region but will likely bury the Republican Party alive in the November election. The American public has been sold on the inevitable victory and has boxed up their belongings ready to move in. If we arrive to find our new reality built on a rotton structure the “awakening” here will be neither gentle nor pleasant. Needless to say, with a growing and souring campaign in Afghanistan the political will to recommit in Iraq is nonexistent.

The other possibility (and anything is possible on this cracked planet) is that the Awakening Councils will either be absorbed by the new government or reintegrate peacefully into society. This could either be a genuine transformation or an intentional effort to keep the lid on the pot for a bit longer. The nature of American politics is that if Iraq fell apart on Jan. 21 it will immediately be blamed on the guy still trying to work his crease into the executive chair. If the change is genuine and sparks a new era for Middle Eastern political processes then President George W. Bush will indeed laugh all the way to his best-selling memoirs.

I’m not in any way prepared to pick one limb on this gargantuan tree and stake my claim. There are simply too many possibilities and too many players and too many things that could go right or go wrong. But the apathy and ignorance of American citizens is truly appalling. Blaming the media is like blaming Wal-Mart for stocking shoddy stuff. Media outlets give people what they want; gossip, no news about yet another bailout attempt and pictures of Kim Kardashian’s gigantic butt. The fact is, denizens of the Republic either do not care or are enmeshed in the belief that all is well and there is nothing further to report.

For the dozen or so actually interested in the future of American policy in the Middle East, the next few days and weeks certainly will be worth watching.

Russian navy getting das boot from Ukraine? Nat-zo-fast says the Ball Gunner

September 18th, 2008, 10:36 am by jhogg

Ukraninan President Victor Yushchenko of poison surving fame has decided to kick the hornet’s nest by suggesting he’s going to boot the Russians out of their long time naval base at Sevastopol (click for map) in the Crimea.

From the Washington Times:

“Undoubtedly, the withdrawal [of the Black Sea Fleet] from the Crimea will affect Russia’s security in the south. New bases in the Mediterranean Sea could make up for the departure,” Rear Adm. Andrei Baranov stated Monday according to a report carried by the RIA Novosti news agency.

Ukraine’s pro-American President Viktor Yushchenko has been putting pressure on Russia’s leasing of the Sevastopol base in the month since Russian forces occupied one-third of the former Soviet republic of Georgia in the Caucasus in a five day operation Aug. 8-12.

Mr. Yushchenko’s policy has infuriated the Russians, who have dominated the Black Sea for almost a quarter of a millennium. Sevastopol is also a fabled fortress and hero city in Russian history that was only conquered after long, heroic sieges in the Crimean War of 1854-55, and against the British and the French, and in 1942 against the Nazis.

Yushchenko squeaked out a victory (and a life) in the 2004 presidential elections riding a thin wave of pro-Western sentiment over the Russian oriented Viktor Yanukovych. The west shifting into full speed jibberish immediately dubbed this the “Orange Revolution” and proclaimed it a glorious victory for democracy despite the well known interventions of foreign government into Ukranian politics. When questioning the west’s love for democracy we need only recall the words of the great dope Henry Kissinger:
“I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its own people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.”

Ukraine like Georgia is all geared up and hopeful that the big boys out NATO way are going to invite them to sit at the cool kids table. Russia is, of course, telling Ukraine to stuff it up their treaty hole, and with a little over 17% ethnic Russians and enough eastern Ukrainians that might as well be Russians the chances of Ukraine running away with a wide pro-West coalition rank right up there with Bob Barr winning the presidency.

Militarily, it’s not entirely clear what would be accomplished by moving the Russian fleet out of the Black Sea and into the Mediterranean. Everybody that gets into the Black goes through Turkey, and Turkey would find itself in an unenviable position of choosing between NATO’s marching orders or staying cozy with Russia and the trading relation worth an estimated $25 billion. By hook or by crook, Russia could still find itself as the big hoss of the Black Sea.

For the U.S., having a large part of the Russian fleet stationed in Tartarus, Syria (map) would hardly be an improvement over having them squirreled away in the Black Sea. Particularly in regards to Israel, having a fleet with air capabilities would mean a threat that Israel has never taken seriously, those fast, zippy things in the air. A problem that would hinder strikes on Iran and potentially get downright ugly if it came to blows with Lebanon for the zillionth time.

But to understand the grooviest possible scenario you first need to see the map of the 2004 elections in Ukraine… TA-DA!

Ukraine einfach Wahlen 3WG english.png

When someone points out that 1/3 of Ukraine, the part with the most Russians incidentally, wants a more Moscow-oriented posture the real daisy of a scenario comes into play - a vast swatch of Ukraine breaking off and attempting to rejoin Russia, and that little red dot at the bottom that voted for the pro-Russian guy to the tune of 88.83%, that just happens to be Sevastapol - the port in question.

If push comes to shove, and both of the very special boys running for the big seat in D.C. give every indication that it is, we could be looking at a reshuffling of some really old borders. All Russia would even need are the two eastern oblasts and the southern one containing the Navy base. With 97%, 93% and 81% that goal could be entirely within reach. To give you an idea, in 2004 George Bush won Texas by a piddly 62% and we called THAT a landslide.

So Viktor Yuschenko, for whatever else he might be, is not an idiot. He’s lived through a Ukranian election (barely) and he knows the political landscape. It’s not likely he’s looking for a good excuse to stir up pro-Russian sentiment and lose big chunks off his country, likely never to be seen again. So the idea of booting the Russians out of the Black Sea might sound tempting to the vicious lipsticked pitbulls in Washington, but living as a Russian neighbor brings with it certain realities. Surely we are promising to “support” Ukraine. But our dear Georgian president might be phoning ole pineapple face to inform him just how much traction that support had when the Russian army was merily dancing jigs on the rubble of his country.

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site