Search: Site   Web
The Ball Gunner ~ Snarky commentary on global military affairs

Archive for the 'Russia' Category

The Times lines ‘em up and I knock ‘em down

October 20th, 2008, 9:27 am by jhogg

The NY Times article, Russia is striving to modernize its military, actually does a passing job on the subject. The Russian military, particularly the army, is one long experiment in ruin. The culture of dedovshina (literally, rule by grandfathers) has been practically impossible to shake within the conscript system. For those not in the know, dedovshina is the hazing practice within the Russian army that rivals the treatment in any maximum security prison in the United States.

But the Times drops the ball when it listens a little TOO much to the Pentagon talking points:

Which is not to say that the United States will stop judging Russian behavior in light of what it considers a clumsy, ill-advised and unnecessary invasion of the former Soviet republic of Georgia.

Wait… what? Clusmy and ill-advised? The Ball Gunner has long argued that the Russians did precisely what they intended to do in Georgia. Send a message, knock some heads and then get out of town before the locals can cobble together an insurgency. Note that there is now a de jure if not de facto South Ossetia. There are lots of points to be made about clumsy, ill-advised invasions. But me thinks Georgia is not the one they should be pointing at.

On the matter of horn tooting:

“What the Russian leadership has discovered is proof of an old maxim: that a foreign policy without a credible military is no foreign policy,” said Dale R. Herspring, a scholar on Russian military affairs at Kansas State University.

I took a class with this fellow. He’s a former Foreign Service Officer, an absolute fountain of knowledge, fluent in several languages and a right bastard. The Ball Gunner is immensely fond of him.

And finally, a mad lib for your pleasure:

An irony is emerging. One central cause of the (insert possessive country here) collapse was that its centrally planned, calcified economy simply could not support the (insert above country’s capital city) superpower military ambitions.

The New York Times picked “Soviet Union” and “Kremlin.” How many examples can YOU come up with?

Russian navy getting das boot from Ukraine? Nat-zo-fast says the Ball Gunner

September 18th, 2008, 10:36 am by jhogg

Ukraninan President Victor Yushchenko of poison surving fame has decided to kick the hornet’s nest by suggesting he’s going to boot the Russians out of their long time naval base at Sevastopol (click for map) in the Crimea.

From the Washington Times:

“Undoubtedly, the withdrawal [of the Black Sea Fleet] from the Crimea will affect Russia’s security in the south. New bases in the Mediterranean Sea could make up for the departure,” Rear Adm. Andrei Baranov stated Monday according to a report carried by the RIA Novosti news agency.

Ukraine’s pro-American President Viktor Yushchenko has been putting pressure on Russia’s leasing of the Sevastopol base in the month since Russian forces occupied one-third of the former Soviet republic of Georgia in the Caucasus in a five day operation Aug. 8-12.

Mr. Yushchenko’s policy has infuriated the Russians, who have dominated the Black Sea for almost a quarter of a millennium. Sevastopol is also a fabled fortress and hero city in Russian history that was only conquered after long, heroic sieges in the Crimean War of 1854-55, and against the British and the French, and in 1942 against the Nazis.

Yushchenko squeaked out a victory (and a life) in the 2004 presidential elections riding a thin wave of pro-Western sentiment over the Russian oriented Viktor Yanukovych. The west shifting into full speed jibberish immediately dubbed this the “Orange Revolution” and proclaimed it a glorious victory for democracy despite the well known interventions of foreign government into Ukranian politics. When questioning the west’s love for democracy we need only recall the words of the great dope Henry Kissinger:
“I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its own people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.”

Ukraine like Georgia is all geared up and hopeful that the big boys out NATO way are going to invite them to sit at the cool kids table. Russia is, of course, telling Ukraine to stuff it up their treaty hole, and with a little over 17% ethnic Russians and enough eastern Ukrainians that might as well be Russians the chances of Ukraine running away with a wide pro-West coalition rank right up there with Bob Barr winning the presidency.

Militarily, it’s not entirely clear what would be accomplished by moving the Russian fleet out of the Black Sea and into the Mediterranean. Everybody that gets into the Black goes through Turkey, and Turkey would find itself in an unenviable position of choosing between NATO’s marching orders or staying cozy with Russia and the trading relation worth an estimated $25 billion. By hook or by crook, Russia could still find itself as the big hoss of the Black Sea.

For the U.S., having a large part of the Russian fleet stationed in Tartarus, Syria (map) would hardly be an improvement over having them squirreled away in the Black Sea. Particularly in regards to Israel, having a fleet with air capabilities would mean a threat that Israel has never taken seriously, those fast, zippy things in the air. A problem that would hinder strikes on Iran and potentially get downright ugly if it came to blows with Lebanon for the zillionth time.

But to understand the grooviest possible scenario you first need to see the map of the 2004 elections in Ukraine… TA-DA!

Ukraine einfach Wahlen 3WG english.png

When someone points out that 1/3 of Ukraine, the part with the most Russians incidentally, wants a more Moscow-oriented posture the real daisy of a scenario comes into play - a vast swatch of Ukraine breaking off and attempting to rejoin Russia, and that little red dot at the bottom that voted for the pro-Russian guy to the tune of 88.83%, that just happens to be Sevastapol - the port in question.

If push comes to shove, and both of the very special boys running for the big seat in D.C. give every indication that it is, we could be looking at a reshuffling of some really old borders. All Russia would even need are the two eastern oblasts and the southern one containing the Navy base. With 97%, 93% and 81% that goal could be entirely within reach. To give you an idea, in 2004 George Bush won Texas by a piddly 62% and we called THAT a landslide.

So Viktor Yuschenko, for whatever else he might be, is not an idiot. He’s lived through a Ukranian election (barely) and he knows the political landscape. It’s not likely he’s looking for a good excuse to stir up pro-Russian sentiment and lose big chunks off his country, likely never to be seen again. So the idea of booting the Russians out of the Black Sea might sound tempting to the vicious lipsticked pitbulls in Washington, but living as a Russian neighbor brings with it certain realities. Surely we are promising to “support” Ukraine. But our dear Georgian president might be phoning ole pineapple face to inform him just how much traction that support had when the Russian army was merily dancing jigs on the rubble of his country.

Stupid about Pakistan and wrong about Russia - beam me up, Scotty.

September 10th, 2008, 8:43 am by jhogg

It’s sometimes all I can do to keep from flying back to my bed, bottle of “medicine” firmly in hand, and contemplating ways to leave this universe and emerge in another. When the tide of stupid crashes endlessly against the levies, I suppose this is a natural reaction.

Behold:

The number of Hellfire missile attacks by Predators in Pakistan has more than tripled, with 11 strikes reported by Pakistani officials this year, compared with three in 2007. The attacks are part of a renewed effort to cripple al-Qaeda’s central command that began early last year and has picked up speed as President Bush’s term in office winds down, according to U.S. and Pakistani officials involved in the operations. 

That would be the Washington Post article, “In hunt for Bin Ladin, a new approach.”

There is nothing new here, the grasp of warfare in this post is as old as Napoleon and cold as his bones. Note the theme - that we can concentrate on the base in Pakistan and beat back the central command - presumably to Berlin or possibly Krakow. The article goes on to state that we are now looking for Bin Ladin by flying around in Predators and shooting the occasional missile with predictable results.

Apparently the Post writer and whoever ladeled out this story consider that the Pakistan-Afghan border is some tiny, irrelavant place and that with enough Predators and enough missiles we are bound to find him, you know, eventually. The premise of the article and of the strategy simply do not wash with reason or logic. It is what my grandfather referred to as “bottle-assing around” - ineffectually moving around in an attempt to look busy.

______________________________________________________________

Onward and upward.

The mighty darlings at the Heritage Foundation (oh how I love them) have served up yet another steaming platter of preposterous. You can find it in the ominously titled “The Return of History:  Confronting the Russian Bear after the Georgian War.” I think the better title would be, “Europe and Russia: lets you and him fight.”

It’s the same old tired story: that we need to like, TOTALLY invite the Ukraine and Georgia to NATO, and Russia is like so totally mean, and I just can’t believe what Vladimir Putin was wearing the other day. OMG LOL!

You can always tell when the apes are getting serious because they throw in the serious word du jure - geopolitical. Like so -  The Russian-Georgian war rocked the geopolitical landscape.
Well dear lord, we know they’re super serious now. The geopolitical landscape, you say. This calls for serious cat!

 

He's serious

Heritage, as always, is chock full of good ideas: the Europeans should goad Russia into war, the Europeans should not have fuel to heat their home of cook their food this winter, the Europeans should make demands that Russia will never accept, the Europeans should militarize and then beef up their NATO presence which will be led by… take a guess who Heritage thinks NATO will be led by.  Come on, I dare you.

Jaded though I am, I will excuse Heritage as simply being utterly clueless. But it’s truly discouraging when supposedly educated people lend credence to this unadulterated nonsense.

In the month since the Russian invasion of Georgia, the Bush administration has crafted a policy that should please some liberal critics and upset conservative hard-liners — a low-key approach that tries to help the Georgians recover without backing Russia further into a corner. 

From my view in the cheap seats it hardly looks like Russis into any corner anywhere. Flush with money, flush with resources, increasing their influence and re-exerting themselves in the so called near-abroad - if they are in a corner it is one of the more spacious and luxuriant corners I have ever seen.

The world has changed dramatically in a few short years and America is refusing to point itself in the new direction. I know its pointless to get upset about things I can’t change, but we are talking about fundamentally failing to understand the big challenges of the modern world. Oh well.

Tu jour Pervez, tu jour

August 20th, 2008, 9:07 am by jhogg

The United State has lost its blank check to operate in Pakistan.

Airstrikes into tribal regions of Pakistan have become a de facto tactic for fighting in Afghanistan. There are no guarantees that the next president will allow the U.S. to use the airspace for the operations, and if the U.S. defies Pakistan and continues the attacks it will only be perceived as an act of war.

The Pashtun in Pakistan and Afghanistan, of course,  do not care where the line on the map falls. They will support the Pashtun. Combined with the ongoing conflict in Georgia, the U.S. has suffered some rather grim political setbacks. It will be interesting to watch how the next few weeks play out.

No news is the only news on Georgia

August 14th, 2008, 9:42 am by jhogg

Mrs. Rice, if you pleaseThere’s too many conflicting stories to piece anything sensible out of the Caucasus hijinks at this point. First the reports are that Russia is withdrawing, and then reports come in that Russia is pushing into Poti, following reports that Georgia has been cut in half. The absence of credible information hasn’t ended wild speculation, which is disappointing when it comes from people who should know better.

We know there is still the banga-banga-banga and pow-pow-pow of guns and mortars going off along with the RRRRRRRRRR of armor moving around. No doubt some hot-blooded Georgian youngsters have decided to gin up an irregular force and try to carve their names into history, so there is likely still some mopping up going on, and any dullard can tell you that you don’t
pHave fun navigating these in a carrierark your tanks and trucks for long unless you really want your wheels and crews to get mortared and artilleried into swiss cheese.

If the Russians are pushing into Poti then it’s truly an ambitious shot. Without Poti the Georgians don’t have a significant port outside of the southern autonomous region of Ajara. There is a dandy little UN map, here. That includes every autonomous region BUT South Ossetia, for some reason. Curious. For the U.S., which is hoping to ride to the rescue, not having a port presents some pretty big problems. For start, supplies would have go be flown in, which is expensive and manpower intensive. A few flights have already come and gone, but its not sure where those are coming from. The air bases in Turkey are convenient, but the Turks, not wanting to get drawn in, might tell the U.S. to find their airspace for that mission elsewhere. When it comes to ships, moving carriers and relief ships into the Black Sea is not only time-consuming and expensive but dangerous as hell.ta da!

If you’re wondering where Georgia is on the Black Sea, then look no further:

The big thing is that the U.S. has to do SOMETHING. It can’t throw Georgia under the bus without being humiliated like… well, like Russia was in the wake of Kosovo. President Bush is certainly not shopping for active hostilities with the Russians right now. If the sitting administration opened a third front it’s very likely that the Republican National Committee building would have a “For Sale” shingle out front come November.

An old friend, who I didn’t know was a Ball Gunner fan, sent me some interesting questions:

Also, is this just the scenario needed to help propel Condi Rice out of obscurity after failing to deliver any meaningful developments between Israel and Palestine? Is this enough to remind people she’s an expert on Soviet/Russo matters and get her some looks for vice president on the McCain ticket?

Rice, last I heard, wasn’t chasing a VP nod. Washington being what it is, the political winds can shift. But it’s not entirely clear that John McCain would want to attach his campaign to a very high-profile member of the controversial Bush presidency. But by all accounts she was (is?) considered very knowledgeable on the region. It seems that she was one of the old-timey bureaucrats who staked her name on the Cold War dragging on into the second coming. Once that dogged out she moved to academia. What remains to be seen is whether her own ego-feeding successes are going to get in her way when it comes to brokering a treaty that is agreeable to all sides. The fact that she is blowing off Moscow entirely on her trip is not encouraging. You’d expect a Russian expert to be aware of how insulting these sorts of things are in Russian culture, or anywhere for that matter.

Russia, on the other hand, must realize that the U.S. hand in this matter is weak. The object is not, and has never been to “take over Georgia,” as much as it is to emasculate the United States. Georgia sent troops to help the U.S. mission in Iraq, the U.S. sent water bottles and chocolate bars to Georgia while they were getting ground into paste. It certainly appears that Georgia expected more support from their ally. President Saakashvili apparently took the aid pledges as a promise to safeguard key Georgian infrastructure components and caused the U.S. to issue a correction. The Georgians are not getting the help they expected, and that disappointment will be an albatross around the neck of U.S. foreign affairs for some time.

As my friend noted:

…the fact that a “new” battle began on the same day as the opening of the Olympic Games is bound to catch people’s eyes.

The 2008 Olympics in Beijing was meant to be China’s “welcome back to the world” party. It is no coincidence that the day also marked the moment that the United States and the world no longer had the luxury of writing off Russia as a has-been power.

A whole friggin media industry serving up stupid pie

August 12th, 2008, 1:11 pm by jhogg

Occasionally the Ball Gunner gets so incensed at the tripe passed of as objective fact that he wants to follow the advice of Hank from a Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court and, “Hang the whole human race and end the farce.”

In general, military matters are poorly reported. I can resign myself to this inevitability. But when stupidity bleeds into sheer revisionism and a propaganda campaign so intense that its almost questionable that it occurred accidentally, then the Ball Gunner gets his scowl on.

This recent incident, a frilly little war involving a dispute that has been going on for near a thousand years, has sent the bed wetters into overdrive. The Russians! They’re coming to get us. We must run and be afraid. AHHHHHHHHHH!!!

AHHHHHH

Let’s look at the headlines from the recent Georgia- Russia conflict.

August 8 from the Telegraph:
Caucuses in crisis: Georgia invades South Ossetia

Read the headline CAREFULLY. Who did what to whom? Who started all this?

August 11 from Global Financial News:
Bush slams Russia for Georgian Invasion, calls relationship “damaged”

Finally, we come to today, August 12, From the LA Times:
U.S. has few military options in Russia response

Really? Four days? It only took FOUR &*$%#@& DAYS to spin this into the EXACT OPPOSITE of what happened?

Let’s look at a few more.

I loved the BIG FARGING stink made about Russia bombing the airports, port and infrastructure.
Reuters on  August 10:
Tblisi civilian airport hit in Russian air strike

To give you a good contrast, here is CNN on July 16, 2006 during the Lebanon-Israeli dustup:
Israeli warplanes hit Beirut suburb

Really? A suburb, you say? Oh wait, in the secondary head -”Israel attacks airports, major highway after Hezbollah lobs rockets”

The War Nerd already has a great entry. Go read it. But if you’re feeling lazy, he sums it up like so:

1.    The Georgians started it.
2.    They lost.
3.    What a beautiful little war!

If you’re wondering what number 3 is all about, and you should be, click the link. Until then, I really, really encourage you to not pay attention to the vast amounts of stupid being dished up piping hot for all to enjoy. I especially hope you notice the literary lobotomies coming out of the pundit factories right now. Lots of whom seem to be seeking active hostilities with Russia.

By all means, if you’ve got some questions shoot the Ball Gunner a line. I’ll help you out the best I can. If you are relying on  any of the big outlets (especially American outlets, European media occasionally does a reasonable job in covering war) then you are being aggressively led astray.

Russia invades Georgia!! The Ball Gunner does NOT hate to say ‘I told you so.’

August 8th, 2008, 8:21 am by jhogg

In fact, the Ball Gunner loooooooooooves to say “I told you so.”

So, in true Ball Gunner fashion:

 Russian troops enter South Ossetia after Georgia offensive

MEGVREKISI, Georgia (AFP) — A Russian army convoy entered South Ossetia on Friday and Russian planes attacked a Georgian military base, reports said, after Georgian forces pounded the capital of the breakaway province and warned of “war” if Russia intervened.

Amid spiralling tensions, Moscow threatened retaliation after Russian forces in the beleaguered city of Tskhinvali were reported killed in a night-time Georgian artillery and air barrage.

Dozens of Russian tanks and military vehicles headed for the four-kilometre (2.5 mile) Roki tunnel, which leads into South Ossetia , an AFP reporter at the frontier said.

Russia’s three main news agencies said a convoy had crossed into South Ossetia.

“We cannot allow the deaths of our countrymen to go unpunished. The guilty parties will receive the punishment they deserve,” Russia President Dmitry Medvedev said earlier.

Georgia’s National Security Council warned however that there would be “a state of war” between the two countries if the Russian military convoy entered the rebel region, which gets strong backing from Moscow.

Russian aircraft meanwhile launched an attack on a military base near Tbilisi, Georgian interior ministry spokesman Shota Utiashvili told AFP.

Georgia’s President Mikheil Saakashvili warned of “large-scale military intervention” and ordered a mass mobilisation.

He said his country’s operation had been successful and “most of South Ossetia’s territory is liberated and is controlled by Georgia.”

 
♫ I told you so. I told you so. I told you so, here:
 Georgia “very close” to war with Russia: who says there’s no fantasy left

And I told you so, here:
The Hoo-Haw about NATO

And I told you so, here:
Doings in Serbia and Pakistan

This is a brilliant move in true Russian fashion. The Americans and NATO will be humiliated and just in time for the Olympic opening ceremony. Georgia was aspiring for NATO membership and was presumably under the protection of the alliance. But the illusion has been shattered.

The Russians are chess players, they have been waiting for their opening ever since they were so rudely brushed off in regard to Kosovo. It seems they have found their door.

Is it bad taste to say that the Russians will go through Georgia like Sherman through Atlanta?

Georgia “very close” to war with Russia: who says there’s no good fantasy left

May 7th, 2008, 9:30 am by jhogg

There’s been a big stink between Russia and Georgia lately, which is to say Russia is doing what it wants and Georgia is complaining to NATO.

The latest from Reuters:

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Russia’s deployment of extra troops in the breakaway Georgian region of Abkhazia has brought the prospect of war “very close”, a minister of ex-Soviet Georgia said on Tuesday.

Separately, in comments certain to fan rising tension between Moscow and Tbilisi, the “foreign minister” of the breakaway Black Sea region was quoted as saying it was ready to hand over military control to Russia.

“We literally have to avert war,” Temur Iakobashvili, a Georgian State Minister, told reporters in Brussels.

Asked how close to such a war the situation was, he replied: “Very close, because we know Russians very well.”

To start with, Georgia does not go to war against Russia in the same sense that Junior’s pee-wee team does not play football against the New York Giants. Whatever its failings, during the 90s, Vladimir Putin’s reign as president (which ends today) saw the resurgence of the Russian military. The Russians have a military tradition a bit beyond extraordinary, they lost 3 million people in the first World War, then fought a long, bloody civil war, to the tune of 9 million, then lost 20 million people in the second World War and still weren’t giving an inch when the U.S. forces in Europe thought they’d be a push over. When you put 32 million people into the meat grinder in half a century while standing firm on the mat you get your hardcore military culture bona fides. Then to spike the ball, you release a picture of a guy doing this: Sweet mother of god

and the Ballgunner is really willing to concede that his manhood is measured in fractions, possibly even fractions with decimals.

When you take this and put it against the Georgians, whose military consists of, uh……… Well you get the point. The Georgian military is defensive oriented, but defensive against other military power houses like Azerbaijan, Armenia or possibly the dreaded Ossetians. Georgia vs Russia would not look even remotely like a fight. The Russians tried the touchy feely stuff in Chechnya, and got embarrassed. Then, someone on the command staff realized they had been reading from the American book, they took a big swig of vodka, proclaimed Мы Русский! and put the hammer down. Do you hear of any problems from Chechnya?

When you consider that every country in the former Soviet sphere is chock full of Russian intelligence agents throughout the government and the military, there arises the even more delightful scenario that Georgia might try to assemble the military only to find half of them already lined up on the other side.

In a lot of ways this is really fun to watch. Russia was warning the west to leave Serbia alone in the Kosovo matter. But in a monument to hardheadedness, NATO got involved in the Orthodox/Catholic/Muslim debacle that predates every standing government in the world and will still be raging when NATO is listed next to League of Nations and Chechnya in the book of “Ooops!” But the U.S. signed off on Kosovo by playing the ethnicity card, oblivious to the fact that the “area” of Kosovo is about as Serbian as Bunker Hill is American. Now, the Russians are saying, “Look! The poor Abkhazians are ethnically distinct from the Georgians, they should have their own country too! It’s even better that they want their country to join our country!” I’m sure it has nothing to do with those lovely Black Sea shipping lanes that are up for grabs (not that Russia doesn’t already have some, but you can never have too many ports.)

Now, the west really looks silly. They can try the, “No, no. That’s not fair,” routine and wind up looking like hypocrites. Or they can throw Georgia under the bus, at which point an alliance with NATO will be shown as worth less than a big pile of doody. Meanwhile, Russia gets to sit back, enjoy the show and ponder their next move. What about those large Russian populations in the Baltic nations? What about the divided population in Ukraine? There are opportunities aplenty for Russia to thank NATO, the E.U. and the U.S. for stomping on its toes for the last few years.

We’re reminded of one of those people from long ago, when folks seemed to know what they were talking about. That someone was Otto von Bismark, who left us this: “The secret of politics? Make a good treaty with Russia.”

The Hoo-haw about NATO

April 2nd, 2008, 10:46 am by jhogg

The chief chair-warmer in the White House is getting spun up for the big NATO conference in Bucharest, Romania, and the event is already interesting to nerds like me. The main event, is Bush going head to head with the two powerhouses of Europe, France and Germany, over NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia, and Russia has made it very, very clear that this is not an option that would behoove anyone.

White House press secretary Dana Perino, has espoused what is either boat loads of moxie or thundering ignorance by saying , “The last time we checked, Russia didn’t get a vote. And this is a NATO discussion, a NATO exercise, and it will be a NATO decision.”

This blithe little statement is nothing short of the White House saying to Russia and West Europe, “Let’s you and him fight.” America might be more or less insulated and isolated from the geopolitics in Europe, but France and Germany don’t have that claim. It gets bloody cold up on that fertile plain, and a whole lot of Russian fuel goes into heating German and French homes.

Russia is also likely hedging bets that Europe wouldn’t like to see the simmering conflict in Serbia and the faux-state of Kosovo blow up. Kosovo, being primarily Muslim, is really and truly an outlier in the European world, which for the last long stretch of history has been divided into Orthodox (east) and Catholic/protestant (west). Russia has the gasoline to pour on the Orthodox fires in Serbia, and given the general instability that lingers in the Balkans, no one is willing to write off a reignition of the ethnic fires of the 1990s.

This dolts at the cable news, of course, are missing the broader picture here. Bush is making an unprecedented attempt to redraw the political lines of Europe, and his failure or success is going to be important for generations.

Doings in Pakistan and Serbia

February 19th, 2008, 1:39 pm by jhogg

    I’d imagine the booze joints around the Pentagon are doing a pretty brisk business over the last few days. There seem to be a lot of ropes unraveling at the same time, and the rabbit-hole we’re dangling over is looking deep and dark and probably not a wonderland at the bottom.

Pakistan’s recent elections have all the appearance of near total annihilation of Musharraf’s Muslim-League Q- party. The general displeasure of Pakistanis toward the ruling party, seen largely as an American puppet, is hardly a shock, and the American refusal to denounce November’s crackdowns and the bloody siege of the Red Mosque worked overtime to undermine the pillars of Washington support in the country. But the magnitude of the loss must be reverberating through the halls of U.S. foreign policy makers.

Via the New York Times 

  From unofficial results the private news channel, Aaj Television, forecast that the Pakistan Peoples Party would win 110 seats in the 272-seat National Assembly, with Mr. Sharif’s party taking 100 seats.

Mr. Musharraf’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, was crushed, holding on to just 20 to 30 seats. Early results released by the state news agency, The Associated Press of Pakistan, also showed the Pakistan Peoples Party to be leading in the number of seats won.

Already rumors are circulating about Musharraf’s resignation, meaning the U.S. might be about to lose one of it’s allies in the region. The U.S. still has substantial influence given the amount of aid that flows into Pakistan. But the incoming parties will not have the same enthusiasm in dealing with the U.S. as the State department is accustomed  to. The new Pakistani government will be in the position to make some demands of their own, especially given the importance of Pakistan’s tribal regions.

Put bluntly, the U.S. cannot succeed in Afghanistan without Pakistan’s help in the border region. Nor can the U.S. act unilaterally within Pakistan without risking regional destabilization. The new Pakistani parliament will be more than willing to play hardball, complete with the knowledge that a good number of the people who elected them would like to see the U.S. fail in Afghanistan.

___________________________________________________
Things have also been complicated by recent announcement of independence from Kosovo. The following days and weeks will be ones of rather loud discomfiture between NATO, which largely supports independence, and Russia, that has sided with Serbia in rejecting the declaration.

There are plenty of other European nations who are worried that a European Union recognition of Kosovo would rekindle other internal nationalist movements. Any member of the European Union can kill an official recognition, since such an act requires consensus. Given Spain, Greece, Romania and Slovakia are all facing similar issues, the odds of consensus seem slim.

Similarly, Russia will kill any United Nations measures toward recognition. This will put Kosovo in an odd sort of limbo, recognized by individual states but not by the international bodies.

Already, there are reports of violence breaking out in the region. While NATO and UN forces are present, it is not clear to what extent they are willing to serve as peace keepers or peace makers. More importantly, this comes at a time of increased tensions between Russia and NATO.

Russia has voiced opposition to this plan from the start and now appears to have egg on its face. A new Russian president will be elected on March 2, and baring some intergalactic anomaly, that president will be Dimitry Medvedev. His presidency will begin with humiliation if Russia doesn’t respond.  If the EU cannot come to a consensus as to Kosovo, the U.S. will be left alone in a staring match against the resurging Russians. The field is complicated by the addition of China,  ever aware of it’s own nationalist-separatist movements, who is siding with Serbia and Russia.

The developments in Pakistan are going to affect how the military does business in Afghanistan and Central Asia, and developments in Kosovo are going to shape NATO and European Union relations for years. The U.S. has had the privilege of unopposed decision making for several years, due to the weakness of other powers and the strength of its alliances. How Washington and the Pentagon handle a return to parity will be interesting to watch.

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site